Claims the CEO of the firm abandoned the child are based on a fraud in the State of Texas after August 11 2001 abduction for extortion of his newborn child, failure of the STATE OF TEXAS to afford a trial with any due process, refusal to process or accept evidence or a plea in two (2) hearings in 2001 where the plaintiff did not appear when summoned, and substitution of the defendant with a court attorney May 20 2002 after burning of the defendant's home and termination of banking privileges across State lines to interfere with representation of the defendant to aid in kidnapping and false claims following in 2002-2013 supporting child concealment and commercial sabotage using the child as a hostage (as recent as 2012 October, under oath, in confession refused lawful arrest for stated prior acts and future intent to violate further the court order in a fraud and child abuse as a joint criminal plan).
The report shows the ORDER TO SURRENDER THE CHILD and ORDER NOT TO CONCEAL THE CHILD along with ORDER TO CONTACT AND REPORT CHANGES IN ADDRESS AND ILLNESS to the accused which have been wholly evaded and never complied with, in effort to imply wilful abandonment of an abducted and concealed Oklahoma Citizen taken at 74 days of age and held by the STATE OF TEXAS without trial for 12 years in violation of their civil rights and enumerated ORDER by the DALLAS COUNTY COURT.
REFUSAL TO ENFORCE THESE ORDERS WHILE COLLECTING FEDERAL AND PRIVATE FUNDS FOR OTHER PORTIONS OF THE CONTRACT FALLS UNDER THE FALSE CLAIMS ACT OF THE UNITED STATES IN CONDUCT OF THE STATE OF TEXAS AND STATE OF OKLAHOMA, AND WILFUL VIOLATION OF INTERNATIONAL LAW ON HUMAN RIGHTS FOR WHICH ALL IMMUNITY HAS BEEN WAIVED IN TREATY. CORPORATIONS WHOSE EMPLOYEES OR ASSETS HAVE BEEN USED IN ANY WAY IN THIS CRIME FALL UNDER LIABILITY UNDER UNITED STATES SUPREME LAW AND 1988 RATIFIED TREATY FOR ANY ROLE WHETHER INTENTIONAL OR BY NEGLECT OR ACT OF COMMERCIAL ADVANTAGE OR GAIN IN ACTS OF AGENCY OR EMPLOYEE CONDUCT.
No comments:
Post a Comment