Our 1991-2013 History & Competitor Fraud Explained
Established in 1991 as "SHADOWDANCERS PRESS" and later contracting with Oklahoma Small Business Develompent Corporation and Garrett Book Company of Ada (OK) as "SHADOWDANCERS DIGITAL PRESS" in the mid-1990s, our firm was incorporated in 1998 as a limited liability company in the State of Oklahoma.
Since then, many dedicated efforts to knowingly infringe upon and impersonate our brand by competitors and criminals have damaged the public in context to the 2001 August 11th abduction for extortion and concealment of the son of our company founder.
This abuse is in direct violation of a COURT ORDER, itself rendered by a Texas Court by two attorneys (neither the attorney of the defendant, nor ever present before the defendant or his attorney) and a judge while the defendant was restrained and prevented from entry to the court due to obstruction and theft of summons after arson and physical intimidation to interefere with the defense and trial.
This brutal war crime under color-of-law enacted without any due process in a criminal denial of civil rights supported by the United States and STATE OF TEXAS in fraud and false claim of child abandonment contrary written confession of child kidnapping and concealment framing the abductor's ongoing commercial stalking and harassment of our staff and officers by the abducting parties and their commercial partners in Texas, Oklahoma, and Michigan.
The abductors continue to hold the child in complete concealment for 11 years - violating the court order and for $108,000 USD and demands to seize the legal property and intellectual trademarks of this firm in extortion and ransom activity in written letters.
This plan to premeditatedly conceal the child was testified to as fact by Donald J. Beal under oath October 31 2012, and a State of Oklahoma County Assistant District Judge referred the matter to Federal Civil Court, claiming no jurisdiction to stop a kidnapping by fraud or enforce a court order for return of the baby despite regional enforcement by letters threatening arrest and confiscation of property.
These threats of illegal action were based on explicit claims outside the court order alleging non-payment of the monetary value ($108,000 USD + $250,000 USD + $2000 USD) of the same court order, contrary the report of child kidnapping for extortion and denial of right to ever face the accuser or hear any evidence supporting child abandonment or loss of contact in the previous hearing at any time and ongoing (2001-2012) death threats supporting the childs abduction and concealment in writing signed by the non-parental abductor.
As a result of this behavior, our office screens our clients carefully prior to accepting new consultations.
Lack of Relief
2001-2013 United States officials remain adamant no crime has been committed, despite State criminal law (21 O.S. 21-891) and Federal (18 U.S.C. 1201-1202; 1513; 1951; 1961; 42 U.S.C. 1981-1989) statutes against such abuse in the use to influence or intimidate a business to surrender property and defamation to damage our securities and commercial reputation.
At the time of the alleged default, the defenant was held against his will in the lobby of the courthouse of DALLAS COUNTY and prevented entry by COURT STAFF against his will, under threat of being refused all right to participate, and on no cause - resulting in an 11 year loss of contact and criminal threats against his business and property, of personal bodily harm, and refused all protection of law without cause in the extortion of $108,000 USD from his person to constitute over 65% of his income after assault at gunpoint following the trial immediately after calls for his murder publicly by the plaintiff and her assocaites in written publications and threats sent to witnesses to suppress their testimony in this matter.
Summons for the hearing above were taken by persons without consent of the defendant and concealed from the defendant until 24 hours prior the hearing, then handed over only then and without time to prepare an adequate defense. The defendant's accounts were frozen during the trial terminating his legal represenation, and no notice delivered to him of this termination of representation both by his attorney and by the judge upon presentation of himself to demand mistrial and refute the claims made against him the same morning of the hearing as soon as he was released by the staff of DALLAS COUNTY COURT.
Since that time, the Attorney General of the State of Texas has threatened to arrest the defendant for inability to pay, in violation of the court order, despite notice of loss of income and interference in career and professional activity by the child abductors prohibited in Federal Law (15 U.S.C. 1673; 18 U.S.C. 1513).
The Director of Oklahoma Department of Human Services (OKDHS) has likewise threatened the defendant upon the fraudulent order to further demand money or surrender of property and license to work and do business if the defendant did not abandon his career and role in favor of other employment at the expense of his business and without consideration for the 10-year ongoing concealment of the child in a premeditated kidnapping for ransom and $10,000 theft of funds in fraud prior the abduction, taking the child out of the home in Dallas County, concealing the child in Denton County, and fraud upon the court record attesting to the claim the child was still in Dallas County at the time of the trial and hearing contrary to the claims made to the father and other witnesses in the child abduction by the abducting party, by the child's mother, and by the child's maternal grandmother in kidnapping activity.
A Federal Civil Lawsuit against the Counties, States, and UNITED STATES is under preparation citing waiver of immunity in International Treaty by the United States and on behalf of all its member states.
No comments:
Post a Comment