April 24th 2013
Organized attacks violating 21 O.S. 21-1951 and 18 U.S.C. 1030 occured March 31st 2013 to April 7th 2013, against two client servers and two corporate servers from common carriers linked to FAIRPOINT COMMUNICATIONS INC. and associates of the user alias "suzieque" and "TheInfamous" against Shadowdancers L.L.C. protected computer systems. These attacks damaged a local business which was no longer under contract for 8 months, and an established business in Purcell Oklahoma, in addition to attempts to penetrate voice communication servers and email systems of Shadowdancers L.L.C. and its clients.These attacks originated from the Italian network INTERBUSINESS and other known associates of the Oklahoma-Texas business group sending commercial threats to our company in support of the CONCEALMENT OF A MINOR CHILD in violation of a PREVIOUS ESTABLISHED COURT ORDER and to obtain in written threats a robbery of $250,000 USD extortion demand in September 2012 from SHADOWDANCERS L.L.C.
We consider these attacks to be part of a criminal activity in the State of Oklahoma, State of Texas, State of Arkansas, State of Michigan, State of California, and State of New York connected to this group by documented business activity, titles, officers standing, and contracts - so described as an "enterprise" under Federal Law (18 U.S.C. 1961). The firm considers this act Interference in Interstate Commerce (18 U.S.C. 1951) and a crime, related child kidnapping and extortion in connection to 11 year 8 month concealment in violation of a COURT ORDER and refusal to SURRENDER THE CHILD as ordered to officers of Shadowdancers L.L.C. - in combination with demands for money and property, trademark rights, control, and interference in business in the prior States upon the cause and use of the child illegally and criminally.
The evidence of this fraud (76 O.S. 76-3) reported numerous times at SOONERCON and related steampunk-themed events and anime conventions as a terrorist-hoax to justify child CONCEALMENT and child-stealing (21 O.S. 21-891) reads as follows:
Due to the danger posed by further fraud, defamation, libel, and misinformation presenting a DIRECT RISK TO THE PUBLIC (76 O.S. 76-4) and threat of injury to a minor child described in open court by DONALD JOHNATHON BEAL as a criminal plan currently underway to deceive a child (76 O.S. 76-8 b), this matter is now public based on these ongoing (2013 March-April) acts of terrorism (Oklahoma Anti-Terrorism Act, section 3 b) and related Federal Law (18 U.S.C. 242, 249; 42 U.S.C. 1981, 1983, 1986).
The child was taken by Donald J. Beal August 11 2001 from the legal home of the child and father, concealed September 2001 under demand for money in threat of perpetual concealment, and has not been delivered or given contact with his father since by direct action of the prior party while the same did claim publicly NO RIGHT TO CONTACT violating the court ORDER pertaining to this child from May 2001, including public claims September 2002 to 2004 during such time the father was assaulted at gunpoint and driven out of the state by the fraud created by Veronica Petersen and Donald Beal to conceal their perjury before the 254th District Courty of the STATE OF TEXAS.
The child is currently being concealed, treated as though "mentally ill" to suppress his testimony of abuse and injury in the care of the parties who seized and concealed him without REQUIRED CONSENT of his father SO ORDERED, and such location and refusal to surrender the child protected by Texas Governor Rick Perry, Texas Attorney General Greg Abbott, and Oklahoma Department of Human Services members Howard H. Hendrick, Gary W. Dart, and Margret Noble - despite demand for the return of the child for 11 years and failure to provide the defendant in such case (father) to ever face his accuser (28 U.S.C. 1738A e), substitution of the defendant with ANOTHER DEFENDANT during the proceeding to create a false defense to knowingly evade criminal complaint of kidnapping in demand for return, and to defraud the UNITED STATES of Federal Funds as described in "MARK BITARA, ET AL v TEXAS" and "MARK BITARA, ET AL v UNITED STATES".
The State of Texas claims in this matter SOVEREIGN IMMUNITY to the demand for due process and habeas corpus in this matter, in spite of violation of the court order and threats of murder and extortion issued by the abducting parties, in a classic HOBBS ACT violation and FALSE CLAIMS ACT fraud against the UNITED STATES TREASURY and 42 U.S.C. 1983 rights (4th, 5th, 8th, 10th, 13th, 14th) in violation of International Criminal Treaty (1988, CPPCG - statutory reference 18 U.S.C. 1091 activity as policy of a State or States).
We consider these attacks to be part of a criminal activity in the State of Oklahoma, State of Texas, State of Arkansas, State of Michigan, State of California, and State of New York connected to this group by documented business activity, titles, officers standing, and contracts - so described as an "enterprise" under Federal Law (18 U.S.C. 1961). The firm considers this act Interference in Interstate Commerce (18 U.S.C. 1951) and a crime, related child kidnapping and extortion in connection to 11 year 8 month concealment in violation of a COURT ORDER and refusal to SURRENDER THE CHILD as ordered to officers of Shadowdancers L.L.C. - in combination with demands for money and property, trademark rights, control, and interference in business in the prior States upon the cause and use of the child illegally and criminally.
The evidence of this fraud (76 O.S. 76-3) reported numerous times at SOONERCON and related steampunk-themed events and anime conventions as a terrorist-hoax to justify child CONCEALMENT and child-stealing (21 O.S. 21-891) reads as follows:
- §21-891. Child stealing - Penalty.Whoever maliciously, forcibly or fraudulently takes or entices away any child under the age of sixteen (16) years, with intent to detain and conceal such child from its parent, guardian or other person having the lawful charge of such child or to transport such child from the jurisdiction of this state or the United States without the consent of the person having lawful charge of such child shall, upon conviction, be guilty of a felony punishable by imprisonment in the State Penitentiary not exceeding ten (10) years.
R.L.1910, § 2435. Amended by Laws 1997, c. 133, § 265, eff. July 1, 1999; Laws 1999, 1st Ex.Sess., c. 5, § 169, eff. July 1, 1999; Laws 2000, c. 370, § 13, eff. July 1, 2000.
NOTE: Laws 1998, 1st Ex.Sess., c. 2, § 23 amended the effective date of Laws 1997, c. 133, § 265 from July 1, 1998, to July 1, 1999.
Due to the danger posed by further fraud, defamation, libel, and misinformation presenting a DIRECT RISK TO THE PUBLIC (76 O.S. 76-4) and threat of injury to a minor child described in open court by DONALD JOHNATHON BEAL as a criminal plan currently underway to deceive a child (76 O.S. 76-8 b), this matter is now public based on these ongoing (2013 March-April) acts of terrorism (Oklahoma Anti-Terrorism Act, section 3 b) and related Federal Law (18 U.S.C. 242, 249; 42 U.S.C. 1981, 1983, 1986).
The child was taken by Donald J. Beal August 11 2001 from the legal home of the child and father, concealed September 2001 under demand for money in threat of perpetual concealment, and has not been delivered or given contact with his father since by direct action of the prior party while the same did claim publicly NO RIGHT TO CONTACT violating the court ORDER pertaining to this child from May 2001, including public claims September 2002 to 2004 during such time the father was assaulted at gunpoint and driven out of the state by the fraud created by Veronica Petersen and Donald Beal to conceal their perjury before the 254th District Courty of the STATE OF TEXAS.
The child is currently being concealed, treated as though "mentally ill" to suppress his testimony of abuse and injury in the care of the parties who seized and concealed him without REQUIRED CONSENT of his father SO ORDERED, and such location and refusal to surrender the child protected by Texas Governor Rick Perry, Texas Attorney General Greg Abbott, and Oklahoma Department of Human Services members Howard H. Hendrick, Gary W. Dart, and Margret Noble - despite demand for the return of the child for 11 years and failure to provide the defendant in such case (father) to ever face his accuser (28 U.S.C. 1738A e), substitution of the defendant with ANOTHER DEFENDANT during the proceeding to create a false defense to knowingly evade criminal complaint of kidnapping in demand for return, and to defraud the UNITED STATES of Federal Funds as described in "MARK BITARA, ET AL v TEXAS" and "MARK BITARA, ET AL v UNITED STATES".
The State of Texas claims in this matter SOVEREIGN IMMUNITY to the demand for due process and habeas corpus in this matter, in spite of violation of the court order and threats of murder and extortion issued by the abducting parties, in a classic HOBBS ACT violation and FALSE CLAIMS ACT fraud against the UNITED STATES TREASURY and 42 U.S.C. 1983 rights (4th, 5th, 8th, 10th, 13th, 14th) in violation of International Criminal Treaty (1988, CPPCG - statutory reference 18 U.S.C. 1091 activity as policy of a State or States).
No comments:
Post a Comment