Summary of 40,000 Jobs Lost Due to U.S. Incompetence in Texas and Oklahoma 2013 June 11th

The best way to view this crime is visually, because words alone do not support or explain fully the scope of sustained criminal premeditated abuse required, both by the abducting parties and their network of professional peers and friends, community, and government aid. You would never expect this story in the United States, but it is real and here and happening, and the reason things cannot be turned around until the public faces the reality of the situation and cost of wilful negligence in child kidnapping under color of law.

The hardest part of this is to accept that someone BOUND BY LAW (a prior civil right like not to kidnap a child from a parent without cause, 76 O.S. 76-8) either inherently (basic law) or by explicit order (COURT ORDER, a UCC CONTRACT with power only due to the surrender of the participants to the authority of the court as mediator, which is void upon violation of common law in U.S. Treaty since 1988), who persists in calling for murder and economic injury (18 U.S.C. 1513) of a felony degree to separate and conceal a child against the lawful rights of the parent and to deceive the entire country and professional community in the kidnapping (for ransom and extortion) of that child under false cause and fraud.

As Father's Day approaches on June 16th, 2013 - 12 years into this kidnapping without relief - this child has NEVER SEEN HIS FATHER since he was 75 days old and the abductor alleges under oath that the mother and abductor have knowingly concealed the existance and nature of the child's father from the child to prevent him from wanting to understand the conditions of separation and concealment, abuse, and limit his right to appeal to his biological father for aid and protectoin over 2001-2013. The child is ORDERED TO BE SURRENDERED TO HIS FATHER EACH FATHER'S DAY, and concealment of the location of the child and threat (by the Attorney General Greg Abbott of the STATE OF TEXAS to arrest on false cause in felony indictment in a fraud and ransom act) the father of the child should the father attempt to enter the State of Texas to make contact or locate the child.

If there were ever a case for SOLE CUSTODY and FEDERAL INTERVENTION against the STATE OF TEXAS and its governor and attorney general, this is that time. As we see trademark brands of our firm touted in $2 billion acquisitions in the State of Texas to violate their use in the State of Oklahoma since 2011, the impact on essentially "stealing" from the State of Oklahoma to benefit the Texas economy and Texas corporations is very clear. First by crushing small Oklahoma businesses by fraud in extortion, and then looting their intellectual property rights for businesses in the sister State at profit, this conduct and concealment qualifies as "war crimes" no different thant he German national socialists became famous for in the 1930s.

The rhetoric being tolerated in the taking and concealment of children and eugenics comments is the very same - sexually deviant in origin and sexually abusive to heterosexual men targeted by this fraud in Oklahoma by (VIP) members of sites like "VampireFreaks.com" (NY) and "TransGenderDate.com" (MI), amid "progressive" political slurs and language to justify what is simply child abuse and child kidnapping stereotypical of pedophile activity and events promoting sex to minors using Walt Disney and popular science fiction (steampunk - tentacle themed 'classes'), and drug culture to support denial of premeditated wrongdoing on stereotypes of "Deadbeat Dads" (15 U.S.C. 1637 -a parent CANNOT be arrested or detained for incapacity to pay support, and such act often is done under contempt of court in a knowing violation of civil rights to intimidate and abuse the poor and force employment as though convicted of wrongdoing upon persons owing child support, which is termed in the orders only as a portion of "REAL INCOME" and does not provide the power to FORCE EMPLOYMENT OR JAIL OR SEIZE PROPERTY under the Federal Law prior established and never revoked or modified).

This father's day, ask yourself - how many YEARS HAS IT BEEN SINCE THE CHILD SAW HIS FATHER? Does he know who his father is? Have the family lied in order to keep other people from asking where the father is or why the father is not involved in the life of the child? Is his family lying to him, to stay out of trouble and control him by concealing him?

This father's day, ask yourself -

• "HOW MANY YEARS HAS IT BEEN SINCE THE CHILD SAW HIS FATHER?"

• "Does the child know who his father is?"

• "Have the family or other abductors and accessories lied in order to keep other people from asking where the father is or why the father is not involved in the life of the child?"

• "Is the concealing family lying to the child, to stay out of trouble and control the child by concealing the court order and right to contact from the child and other parties (including the father from 2002-2012)?"

• "Have the abductors misrepresented SURRENDER OF THE CHILD to the SOLE POSESSION of the father as VISITATION or other slander of less-than-equal parental rights?"

If not explicit in the global view of the parties involved, then in the detailed pattern of behavior and violent letters and claims made over 2001 to 2012 in consistent criminal denial of all contact between a parent from whom the child was taken out of his REGISTERED HOME AT BIRTH owned by the father, to be secreted away for 12 years in places unknown and never reported AS ORDERED EXPRESSLY in the alleged proceedings used to bully, stalk, intimidate, threaten, defame, and falsely reported to defraud teh child's father and his business and family.

If so, that child is kidnapped. And your duty to bring them home is clear - written in the law, in the order, and evasion of either a crime.

We have to use visualization (pictograms) at this point, to illustrate the repeated steps of abuse tied directly to the fraud and public hoax, because law enforcement have expressed a desire to ignore long (2+ page) detailed accounts, depositions, sworn statements, and claim to break up the acts of threats and monetary loss (discounting intellectual property and reputation and safety guarentees in law as unrealized and irrelevant) so as to completely isolate the child custody or possession entirely from the related and directly based criminal threats and acts of abuse. In any other crime this would be accessory after the fact, and is an International crime in this context, but has been denied all related standing both by the State of Texas and State of Oklahoma (rejecting the term "genocide" as a real crime or terms in U.S. treaty, contrary their own laws and Article I Section I of the Constitution of the State of Oklahoma) solely on the basis that jury trial would obstruct the facts and persons of a normal (non-criminal pathology) could not comprehend the motive or capacity to harm a child or go to these obsessive and criminal extremes in the taking, concealment, and exploitation of a child where the parent deprived of rights was not prior married to the mother. This stereotype and (religious/discrimatory) prejudice which is not supported in law (76 O.S. 76-8; 28 U.S.C. 1738A e) is so overwhelming, as to make trial in the State of Texas or State of Oklahoma impossible at this time, and by acts of both States negligence and participation in threats and taking of income and money in-excess of income for 12 years - rendered the victim unable to pursue legal remedy or trial at the Federal Level or International Court. The net result is very similar to the Ghetto creation of the National Socialist Party in Germany in the 1940s, using credit, report of non-payment of an illegal debt in violation of law (15 U.S.C. 1673), and refusal to hold trial or hearings to modify or reduce the claim to guidelines (25% of net disposable income) for 12 years and during times of unemployment and loss of work directly attributable to publicity created to support the child kidnapping and hoax of mental illness in child taking.

By review of the a reasonable person can see this is not a "broad conspiracy of unknown persons", but in fact an ongoing and premeditated criminal hoax perpetrated by specific parties who have recruited actively and directly other persons based on their association with the defendant in the fraudulent "abandonment" trial to commercial sabotage and criminal (18 U.S.C. 2261A) felony stalking of the victim in support of child concealment violating the court order and Federal Law (28 U.S.C. 1738A e). Further, that officers of the State of Texas and State of Oklahoma have knowingly and maliciously refused to act, claiming no jurisdiction (Internet, out-of-state, claims made on Facebook, MySpace, Craigslist, Livejournal) while this year (2012) acting to indict an Ada Firefighter for the same behavior on the same system (Facebook, California based) using the correct jurisdiction (place of discovery, residence of victim threatened at time of threat or refuge due domestic violence or public incitement to violence to interefere in a trial or proceeding).

Child custody is not the "golden third rail" and premeditation in the execution of this crime with commercial scope and violent rhetoric unfit for any proceeding, in pattern behavior, and in ongoing pattern of claims directly contrary the court's explicit instruction - underline the motive, means, and plan to extort as early as statements in 2001 August 11th by Veronica Petersen attesting that the father would "never see his child again, or at least not until the child was old enough to figure out what was going on", combined with threats like those in 2007-2009 from the alias "Reginald" who described in threats the victim as the prisoner in "One Flew Over the Coocoo's Nest", as being reduced to poverty and helplessness screaming in the street for help while the nurses wheeled them in for electroshock to stop them from talking.

These are the actual context of the letters, sent both before the trial and after (during concealment in 2007-2012), showing as the 2011 publication on the .me site created by Donald J. Beal (abductor, Aug 11 2001 - non-family member) the calous criminal mental illness and incapacity to acknowledge any wrongdoing whatsoever in this behavior. Conduct that repeatedly cites the businesses of the victim by name ("Beyond War" trademark in Reginald letters 2008, and by Beal in 2012), and appears on reasonable inspection to be the same author in both claims by a reasonable person (Judge Kilgore, 2012) and to the same end (damaging the father beyond right to do business and commercial capacity to support or recovery the child during his developmental years), using a variety of fallacies of legal argument to purposefully obscure the identity of the author (use of SPARKHOSTING LLC address and omission of name on .com site in 2002-2004, use of false claims of family relationships to obscure identity in "Reginald Letters" after unsolicited contact with the defendant to carry out threats, use of ROBERT HALF TECHNOLOGY address and omission of name paired with hosting the .me domain at the ISP where Alicia Scarbrough's servers (3) were housed in Dallas Texas). Claims that James Allen did "attack" the Gebhardt Broadcasting LLC (VirtBiz.com) server to deflect attention from an 8.3 million ICMP flood attack July 25 2011 on the victim's business during the first week of a criminal police investigation created by associates of Beal (Young and Scarbrough), in attempt to indict Allen to silence his website (Young, stated publicly July 19 2011) and damage his business and child relationship further, and written claim that there "was no case" to excuse the allegations of child kidnapping contrary Texas Court Order # 01-17702-R (Dallas County) paint a picture of a person who is actively deceiving the public and committing perjury to conceal child kidnapping and 12 years of collaboration in stalking activity for commercial sabotage of a pre-existing business (established 1991 with Vision Bank account; incorporated in 1998) using a child-hostage.

To consider that law enforcement will not act upon an CLEAR AND DIRECT ORDER and that officers of Oklahoma Department of Human Services Howard H. Hendrick and Margret Noble did refuse on direct demand for return of the child any right and threaten the defendant with arrest for emploring his right be honored, and by written (2013 Feb) letters of threat to seize "real property" or arrest or suspend the license of the defendant under such circumstances for loss of income related 2011 extortion and public harassment of customers by the abducting parties is unacceptable behavior this Father's Day 2013.

If you son were taken, and concealed, and no effort executed to return him AS ORDERED despite your registration as an AGENT for service of process with the STATE OF OKLAHOMA, while the abductors claimed no obligation to contact you or means to locate you amid threats of murder and extortion sent directly to you and your employees, family, and peers with your business name in the headlines and name in the letters (2011 July 21) for blackmail and demands of property outside the court order, how would you feel? Would you think you would have to DRAW A PICTURE to explain any portion of this abuse? Would you believe in "court immunity" or "public officer immunity" or "Sovereign Immunity" to such denial of any protection or return of your child AS ORDERED? Is lying under oath and lying about the context of a court order not a felony crime in context to child taking for perpetual concealment (so promised by Donald J. Beal under oath in 2013 October 31 before Assistant District Court Judge Martha Kilgore), and refusal to act upon an order or demand payment of awards in such order PRIOR ENFORCEMENT not a criminal act?

We believe so. And so we seek remedy at the Federal and International level now, in appeal, including offer of asylum for retaliation against the career and employment of the victim as a whistleblower on fraud in excess of $500,000,000 USD in Title 42 abuse per year, pursuant to the FALSE CLAIMS ACT and under THE CONVENTION ON THE PREVENTION AND PUNISHMENT OF THE CRIME OF GENOCIDE, citing the psychological and emotional and physical abuse in this case to capstone all aspects of the war crime and wiaver of immunity of the State and Federal officers and agencies involved in non-enforcement of the right to return and safety from criminal threats in this matter, now spanning August 11th 2001 to present (June 12 2013) consecutively.

The statute of limitations in kidnapping is perpetual, per Federal Law, and should apply in this case. The Adam Walsh Child Protection and Safety Act (P.L. 109-248, H.R. 4472, 2006) changed the statute of limitations to enable United States Attorneys to prosecute crimes against children long after they are alleged to have taken place.

For specific statutes see:

18 U.S.C. 1201 - kidnapping for ransom. 18 U.S.C. 2251A - selling or buying of children. Further, Federal Treaty states that all such acts will be punished, as stated in The Convention for the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide, whether under color of law or not and with no immunity of office to include judges and other attorneys involved in such abuse and in denial of immediate remedy upon report of the crime to any official in any capacity per International Law (U.S. Treaty per U.S.C. Article VI, on face value in four-corners-rule, excluding statutory support or action or interpretation). Aid or support of this crime is punishable by up to 20 years in Federal Prison, to include false statements and identity theft to mislead the public or investigators or to retaliate against the parent for seeking return of a child so ORDERED by the court and established legal right to possession and unmolested contact with the child.