October 31st, 2013 - Court Madness

Alleging the child to be "Crazy" under oath, D. Beal did October 31 2012 expose ethnic and eugenics views toward the child and attest this to be the "fault" of the child's father "and his bad DNA". Upon further examination, Beal did admit the diagnosis he was calling "crazy" was in fact a claim by V. Petersen that the child was "autistic", which was not informed as required by law nor consent for treatment given by James Allen in this matter prior the hearing.

Mr. Allen was likewise accused by peers of similar claims at a similar age, and local certified psychologists determined he had a genius level IQ, reading at a college level at the age of 11, and selected for advanced placement programs piloted by McFarland in the City of Ada. These skills make the subject an excellent abstract thinker, which can confuse persons with mental disability or personality disorders who are incapable of anything above concrete thought patterns, and appear disjointed to persons with low IQ or substance abuse history (see D. Beal, DUI conviction 2012).

Autistic and abstract thinkers are very good at finding things in complex data and organizing related ideas across large data sets, as pointed out by a German firm training for this skill, and in pattern James Allen took upon himself the law to discern why the officers of the United States and State of Texas and State of Oklahoma alleged in formal claim Sovereign Immunity to deny him all due process and any semblance of right to face his accuser or enjoy trial in addition to refusing to enforce the court order to return to his possession his only child for 12 years on formal complaint and demand with great contempt and direct letters (Howard H. Hendrick, Greg Abbot, Rick Perry, Brad Henry, Gary W. Dart, Margret Noble) refusing any obligation to provide any protection of law or enforement beyond threats demanding money from him on penalty of arrest and jail where in excess of income and to the exclusion of his real income and established right to practice his career unmolested (15 U.S.C. 1673 b; 18 U.S.C. 1513). The findings discover that the officers assume they are "immune to civil and criminal penalties" completely on face value, and such claim is false and waived in 1988 by the United States Congress, with impact upon the entire United States legal system and Federal Tax Law.

This is, again, misrepresented by Donald J. Beal to presume this finding is "anti-government" or sedition against the "United States of America" when in fact it is simply legal and public law, protected by Oklahoma State Constitution in right to read, discuss, and cite the statutes, treaties, court documents, and impact in Oklahoma Constitution: Article II, and the most express and positive form of civic duty a Citizen of any State may engage in, protected by numerous statutes, and the defamation of such activity as treason or insurrection in citiation an attempt to violate the 1st Amendment rights of the victim further in libel upon record and/or under oath in continued holding and justification activity before a court as FACT to execute the concealment of a child for extortion, ransom, and (generally and specifically by stated express intent and future purpose) to carry out "corruption of blood" by the concealment of a child who is denied (in violation of a COURT ORDER) any knoweldge of his father, right to see his father or be possessed solely by the same, and destruction by psychological and public deceit to destroy the bond between the generations and ability for the father to have a normal life, support himself, or carry on normal relationships without being villified and his reputation (as a parent, leader, academic, and commercial officer) destroyed by this activity and control executed illegally over a child "under color of law".