Tuesday, July 9, 2013

A Perplexing Paradox of Pitiful Proportions



I was thinking this morning, before my usual coffee injection, that in all of these many years Mr. Allen has tried to stress how everyone is demonizing and defaming him and how they are (brace yourself) 'ruining his good name'. Of course, the only way to know this is by going to any of his plentiful websites and sifting through his lengthy paragraphs libeling and demonizing a list of given people, and then it raises the question, 'who is demonizing who here?' I can go onto any search engine and type in the name of our favorite narcissist, or his vampire alias, company names or so-called MMO game name and FIND NOTHING by anyone else. Instead I find more websites by Mr. Allen based on defamation of his targets as before and am left wondering, where are these actions defaming him at? 

I can't find them, and I have looked. You try it.

So pretend there are many websites out there demonizing our CEO guy here and they ARE satirizing him and insulting him as he claims, that would then give him justification for saying those things, but sadly as I said before, there are none. This humble blog is as close as it gets and it hardly compares to his 100+ sites that ALL make accusations on his stalking victims. If Mr. Allen was really innocent in this madness, he would have a handful of websites maybe, 'business' related, and they would not even make a mention of the unfolding drama instead focusing on his project or company (if they were real). Instead, one is met with a volley of his hateful, lying sites spewing his defamation and libel openly for all to read. Lists of endless crimes and actions allegedly against him are easily found. Not even the interwebz challenged has trouble finding them, he has made it that over-the-top.



To know how people are ruining our friendly Ada wacko's reputation (I am sorry but I must laugh a while before I continue typing more...) you must go to his sites to find this out. There is no other way. Unfortunately, as mentioned you have to wade through his maniacal rants and attacks on other people to get informed about this, and that is often hard to do. Much less, you only get a sentence of mention and no evidence on hand, leaving us with more theories again. The very thing that Judge Kilgore dismissed his stupid court case over last October. Shameful dudes. Mr. Allen expects people to trust his word on his sites. Why? Because he is pictured wearing a suit looking important or like a genius visionary? No, sorry but that is not believable to me. It takes no time to see that James Allen is an idiot, he is not even of mediocre intelligence and creativity to be worthy of credibility. 

It takes more than a 100+ websites to make something a fact. Repeating the same story does not make it real after a while, no matter how many ways, times or methods it is attempted. Why would I believe one website over another? The crippling factor in Mr. Allen's approach is a severe lack of evidence to support his words. There are none see, and that is where he is hurting. Does he think that a constant mention of basically the same rubbish on site after site makes it like a religion? Where people won't question it and just accept it at face value? Hopefully those of you who read this and then his rubbish can see for yourselves that his words are just the ravings of a madman.  

The paradox lies in going to his sites, steeped in defamation and libel, to be 'informed' about how he is being defamed and libeled...yeah, it sounds odd doesn't it dude? That is because Mr. Allen is so far deep in his insanity that he cannot comprehend that he is the one doing the very bad deed he is whining about, and we have it in writing, the ONLY proof at all in this ironically. Because of Mr. Allen's intense and unrelenting extreme narcissism, he is simply incapable of being able to tell who is the real bad guy in this even though he looks in the mirror everyday. 



Sure he has these flowcharts in abundance to show and detail his wild theories on how everyone has played their hand at his failure and career suicide, but he doesn't give evidence, only dates and various other elements, thinly given as his 'proof'. Little did we know that he runs off to the police with every panicked moment or slight towards him, hell I didn't know he took my rubbish seriously at the time, he never replied back except on Facebook. Mr. Allen hides behind his websites, denying all others a chance to voice their concerns or opposition to his active libel and defamation, he blocks everyone from contact and then passive-aggressively he attacks them on his sites. His little pillow fort is not that strong though. Its faults lie in the fact that it is make-believe and can tumble in a second. Remember last October for one recent and sterling example of this. No evidence for claims and it fails instantly. 

In short, just because someone posts incessantly about something does make it true, and especially the old adage, 'He who speaks against something enough is usually the one doing it himself.' In this case it is true to the letter. Mr. Allen, if you want to tell us something, one site will do it with plenty of supporting evidence, and it might be believable. Since you can't give us either, you are lying and not worth the read or time.  

  

No comments:

Post a Comment